LLM application security audit
Direct and indirect prompt injection, data exfiltration, guardrail bypass, context leakage. Architecture review and concrete adversarial testing.
Audits of LLM applications and agents, red teaming, model supply-chain assessment. AI in production, evaluated the way an adversary would.
A specialty under construction. Our methods draw on the state of the art (OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS); we scope every engagement precisely and say so clearly when a test falls outside our current perimeter.
Its attack surface goes beyond the code: it includes its natural-language inputs, the tools it can act on, its memory and context, and the supply chain of the models it embeds. Each of these is a vector.
Five surfaces, evaluated the way an adversary would — not just the model, but everything around it.
Direct and indirect prompt injection, data exfiltration, guardrail bypass, context leakage. Architecture review and concrete adversarial testing.
Agents with tools, access and autonomy. Tool misuse, privilege escalation, unintended actions, the blast radius of a hijack.
A structured offensive campaign against your AI system and its environment, up to realistic business scenarios — not just lab cases.
Classifying your systems by risk level, identifying applicable obligations and a compliance plan — the security angle, not just the legal one.
Third-party models, datasets, dependencies, downloaded weights: poisoning, backdoor and unverified-provenance risks.
Inputs, tools, memory, guardrails, supply chain — seen as an adversary would.
Reproducible vulnerabilities, severity, vectors and trigger conditions.
Fixes sequenced by real impact, compatible with your operations.
Applicable obligations and gaps, from a security angle.
Product teams integrating LLMs or agents, regulated sectors, organisations exposing an AI system to their customers or sensitive data. If your AI can act, read or decide, its attack surface deserves to be assessed.